4.4 Article

Phytochemical investigation of Ludwigia adscendens subsp. diffusa aerial parts in context of its biological activity

期刊

BMC CHEMISTRY
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13065-022-00909-8

关键词

Ludwigia adscendens subsp; diffusa; Onagraceae; Triterpenoids; Flavonoids; Hepatoprotection; Cytotoxicity

资金

  1. Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF)
  2. Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the phytochemical composition of Ludwigia adscendens subsp. diffusa and screened its biological activities. The aerial parts of L. adscendens were found to contain various phytochemicals with potential health benefits.
Ludwigia adscendens subsp. diffusa (Onagraceae), an important aquatic herb widely distributed in the Nile River and canals in Egypt. The goal of the current study is to investigate the phytochemical composition of L. adscendens aerial parts n-butanol and ethyl acetate fractions and screening of its biological activities. Phytochemical investigation of L. adscendens resulted in the isolation and purification of eleven compounds belonging to flavonoids, saponins, triterpenoids, and oligosaccharides, of which one compound was identified as new using different spectroscopic techniques. Compound 2 was identified as a new compound namely, 3-O-[beta-D-glucopyranoside (1 & RARR; 4) alpha-L-rhamnopyranoside]-23-O-feruloyl-hederagenin-28-O-[alpha-L-rhamnopyranoside (1 & RARR; 2) beta-D-glucopyranoside], along with other 10 well know compounds. Furthermore, antidiabetic, hepatoprotective and cytotoxic activities of n-butanol and ethyl acetate fractions were investigated in vitro, revealing that ethyl acetate fraction was the most active as antidiabetic (IC50 = 62.3 mu g/mL), hepatoprotective (IC50 = 80.75 mu g/mL), and cytotoxic against human prostate cancer cell line (IC50 = 52.2 mu g/mL). Collectively, L. adscendens aerial part is rich with a myriad of phytochemicals with potential health benefits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据