4.5 Article

Breastfeeding self-efficacy predicts breastmilk feeding in preterm infants at discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit

期刊

NURSING OPEN
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 1863-1870

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1450

关键词

breastfeeding self-efficacy; breastmilk feeding; neonatal intensive care unit; preterm infants

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to examine the association between breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSE) and breastmilk feeding at discharge among mothers of preterm infants. The results showed that mothers exclusively breastfeeding their infants at discharge had significantly higher BSE scores at admission compared to those providing a combination of breastmilk and formula or only formula. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that higher BSE at admission, maternal birth in Canada, and absence of diabetes were significant predictors of exclusive breastmilk feeding at discharge.
Aim: To examine the association between breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSE) and breastmilk feeding at discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit among mothers of preterm infants. Design: Secondary analysis of the Family Integrated Care (FICare) cluster randomized controlled trial. Methods: Data from 221 mothers of preterm infants who participated in the standard care group of the trial were analysed. BSE at admission was assessed using the modified Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (BSES-SF). Breastmilk feeding was assessed using 24 hr maternal recall at discharge. Results: Mothers who were exclusively breastmilk feeing their infants at discharge had statistically significantly higher mean BSES-SF scores at admission (68.4, SD = 13.7) than those providing a combination of breastmilk and formula or only formula (59.6, SD = 14.7; p < .001). Multivariable logistic regression showed that higher BSE at admission, maternal birth in Canada, and absence of diabetes were statistically significant predictors of exclusive breastmilk feeding at discharge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据