4.6 Article

Adaptive Sliding-Mode Path-Following Control of Cart-Pendulum Robots with False Data Injection Attacks

期刊

ACTUATORS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/act12010024

关键词

cart-pendulum systems; adaptive neural networks; path-following control; FDI attacks; filter operators; sliding-mode control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the displacement path-following problem for a class of disturbed cart-pendulum systems under fake data injection (FDI) actuator attacks. A filter operator is proposed to estimate the weight vector caused by unknown attacks and disturbances, enabling parameterization of the actuator attacks using neural networks. Robust path-following control schemes are then proposed, leveraging adaptive neural network and integral sliding-mode techniques, to counteract the impacts of disturbances and FDI attacks. The closed-loop cart-pendulum system with neural network weight estimations and sliding functions achieves uniformly ultimately bounded stability results based on Lyapunov stability theory. Finally, a simulation model of a material robot is employed to validate the proposed control strategy.
This paper addresses the displacement path-following problem for a class of disturbed cart-pendulum systems under the fake data injection (FDI) actuator attacks. A filter operator is proposed to estimate the weight vector caused by unknown attacks and disturbances, so that the actuator attacks can be parameterized using neural networks. Then, combined with filter signals and based on adaptive neural network and integral sliding-mode techniques, robust path-following control schemes are proposed to withdraw the impacts of disturbances and FDI attacks. The uniformly ultimately bounded stability results of the closed-loop cart-pendulum system with neural network weight estimations and sliding functions are achieved based on Lyapunov stability theory. Finally, a simulation model of a material robot is used to verify the proposed control strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据