4.7 Article

Evaluating Data Augmentation Effects on the Recognition of Sugarcane Leaf Spot

期刊

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12121997

关键词

sugarcane disease; image segmentation; deep learning; data augmentation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the recognition and segmentation of plant diseases in complex environments using deep learning. By utilizing data augmentation techniques, the recognition accuracy of the model is improved. The research achieved significant success in this field.
Research on the recognition and segmentation of plant diseases in simple environments based on deep learning has achieved relative success. However, under the conditions of a complex environment and a lack of samples, the model has difficulty recognizing disease spots, or its recognition accuracy is too low. This paper is aimed at investigating how to improve the recognition accuracy of the model when the dataset is in a complex environment and lacks samples. First, for the complex environment, this paper uses DeepLabV3+ to segment sugarcane leaves from complex backgrounds; second, focusing on the lack of training images of sugarcane leaves, two data augmentation methods are used in this paper: supervised data augmentation and deep convolutional generative adversarial networks (DCGANs) for data augmentation. MobileNetV3-large, Alexnet, Resnet, and Densenet are trained by comparing the original dataset, original dataset with supervised data augmentation, original dataset with DCGAN augmentation, background-removed dataset, background-removed dataset with supervised data augmentation, and background-removed dataset with DCGAN augmentation. Then, the recognition abilities of the trained models are compared using the same test set. The optimal network selected based on accuracy and training time is MobileNetV3-large. Classification using MobileNetV3-large trained by the original dataset yielded 53.5% accuracy. By removing the background and adding synthetic images produced by the DCGAN, the accuracy increased to 99%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据