4.6 Article

Identifying the shift in global wildfire weather conditions over the past four decades: an analysis based on change-points and long-term trends

期刊

GEOSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s40562-022-00255-6

关键词

Change-point; Wildfire weather; Trend; Global

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we identified change-points and long-term trends of six wildfire-related variables and attempted to explain the cause of change-point from atmospheric-oceanic indices. The main change-point dates for the precipitation, temperature, and drought codes, as well as the duff moisture code, fine fuel moisture code, and fire weather index, were 1995-2000 and 2000-2005, respectively. We also discussed the relationship between the change-point of six variables and atmospheric-oceanic indices through the correlation coefficient, and divided the globe into eight homogenous wildfire weather zones based on the change-point dates and long-term trends of the six variables.
Most of studies on change-point at a regional or global scale have only examined a single hydrometeorological variable and have been unable to identify any underlying explanations. In this study, we identified change-points and long-term trends of six wildfire-related variables and attempted to explain the cause of change-point from atmospheric-oceanic indices. As a result, we discovered that the main change-point dates for the precipitation, temperature, and drought codes, as well as the duff moisture code, fine fuel moisture code, and fire weather index, were 1995-2000 and 2000-2005, respectively. Furthermore, the relationship between the change-point of six variables and atmospheric-oceanic indices was discussed through the correlation coefficient. For example, the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation was found to dominate the precipitation in West Africa. In addition, we divided the globe into eight homogenous wildfire weather zones based on the change-point dates and long-term trends of the six variables.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据