4.4 Article

Evaluating the implementation of a multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention for people with severe mental illness in sheltered housing: effectiveness-implementation hybrid randomised controlled trial

期刊

BJPSYCH OPEN
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2022.600

关键词

Schizophrenia; sedentary behaviour; exercise; diet; implementation science

资金

  1. Stichting Zorgondersteuningsfonds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a multidisciplinary lifestyle-enhancing support for people with severe mental illness living in sheltered housing. Results showed that the intervention was not implemented as intended and did not lead to clinical health improvements, with organizational factors playing a key role in the success or failure of the implementation. More intensive implementation strategies at the organizational level are needed for lifestyle interventions in sheltered housing for people with severe mental illness.
BackgroundLifestyle interventions can improve health-related outcomes for people with severe mental illness (SMI), but few studies evaluate this potential in everyday settings. After a successful approach in routine inpatient mental healthcare (MULTI), we sought to replicate this multidisciplinary lifestyle-enhancing support in people with SMI living in sheltered housing (MULTI_sh). AimsTo evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of MULTI_sh (trial registration: NCT03157557). MethodIn an effectiveness-implementation hybrid cluster-randomised controlled trial, six municipalities with sheltered housing facilities in The Netherlands were randomly assigned to MULTI_sh (n = 3) or treatment as usual (TAU, n = 3). After 12 months, we evaluated effects on metabolic health, sedentary behaviour/physical activity (ActiGraph GT3X+), quality of life (EuroQol 5D, WHOQoL-Bref) and psychopathology (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Expanded Version) using multiple regression, adjusting for baseline values and municipalities (intention to treat and per protocol). In addition, implementation fidelity and barriers/facilitators were evaluated (Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovation). ResultsOf 177 eligible patients, 74 (42%) could be included in the analyses. Health outcomes did not substantially improve with MULTI_sh (n = 45) compared with TAU (n = 29). MULTI_sh was not implemented as intended. Most patients and all healthcare professionals believed that patients' lifestyle should be part of treatment, but implementation was primarily (in)directly hindered by organisational factors (e.g. staff shortages, complexity of participation, lack of time and difficulty getting patients involved). ConclusionsMULTI_sh was not implemented as intended and no clinical health improvements were found. Organisations are decisive in the success or failure of the implementation of lifestyle interventions for people with SMI. More intensive implementation strategies on this level are warranted in sheltered housing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据