Non-Invasive Treatments for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Study design Systematic Review. Objectives The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive procedures in relieving chronic pain due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS). Methods Since patients who suffered from FBBS are often non-responders to analgesics, we compared Visual Analogical Scale for low back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, trial success rate, adverse events and complications between conservative treatment groups and control groups. Results The included studies were 15. Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) was performed in 11 trials; 4 studies assessed the efficacy of different epidural injections; one study evaluated repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. All the studies reported back and leg pain relief after treatment with SCS, with a significant superiority in high frequences (HFS) group, compared to low frequences (LFS) group. Moreover, disability decreased with each non-invasive treatment evaluated. Epidural injections of steroids and hyaluronidase have shown controversial results. Adverse events were described in 7 studies: lead migration, hardware-related events, infection and incisional pain were the most reported. Finally, trial success rate showed better outcomes for HFS. Conclusions Our systematic review highlights the efficacy of conservative treatments in FBSS patients, with an improvement in pain scores and a decrease in disability index, especially after SCS with HFS. However, due to the lack of homogeneity among trials and population characteristics, further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of non-invasive interventions in patients affected by FBSS.

Automated summary

This systematic review examines the efficacy of non-invasive procedures in relieving chronic pain caused by Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS). The findings indicate that conservative treatments, particularly high-frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation, demonstrate improvement in pain scores and reduced disability index. However, further research is needed to confirm the effectiveness of non-invasive interventions due to heterogeneity among trials and population characteristics.