4.6 Article

Infrastructure development, human development index, and CO2 emissions in China: A quantile regression approach

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1114977

关键词

infrastructure; human development index; CO2 emissions; China; quantile regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the relationships between infrastructure development, human development index (HDI), and CO2 emissions in China. The findings show that infrastructure has positive and statistically significant associations with HDI, CO2 emissions, and GDP across all quantiles. While recent infrastructure upgrades improve living standards and HDI, they also contribute to environmental damage as infrastructure is the main source of CO2 emissions in the country. The government should invest in sustainable infrastructure, such as low carbon transportation options like railway infrastructure, urban metros, and light rail, to mitigate CO2 emissions.
This study investigates the relationships between infrastructure development, human development index (HDI), and CO2 emissions in China. Infrastructure has played an essential role in achieving social and economic developmental goals in China, but environmental pollution has significantly increased in the country in the last two decades. Our analysis uses time series data from 1990 to 2021 and quantile regressions, and we find that infrastructure has positive and statistically significant relationships with HDI, CO2 emissions, and GDP in all quantiles. Recent infrastructure upgrades improve living standards and increase HDI but damage the environment, and infrastructure is the main source of CO2 emissions in the country. Therefore, the government should invest in sustainable infrastructure to mitigate CO2 emissions. The government may consider infrastructure options such as low carbon transportation, including railway infrastructure, urban metros, and light rail.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据