4.5 Article

Determination of trace levels of triazines in corn matrices by bar adsorptive microextraction with a molecularly imprinted polymer

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 756-761

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201501101

关键词

Bar adsorptive microextraction; Corn; Floating sampling technology; Molecularly imprinted polymers; Triazines

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation [2011/09898-4, 2014/20424-2 FAPESP]
  2. Fundacao para a ciencia e a tecnologia (Portugal) [SFRH/BPD/86071/2012, UID/MULTI/00612/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This manuscript addresses the determination of triazines (ametryn, atrazine, simazine, and terbutryn) in corn matrices using bar adsorptive microextraction coated with a selective molecularly imprinted polymer phase following microliquid desorption and high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. The molecularly imprinted polymer was synthesized using atrazine as a template and methacrylic acid as a functional monomer. Assays performed in 25 mL of ultrapure water samples spiked at 8.0 mu g/L yielded 80-120 % recoveries under the evaluated experimental conditions. The method showed an accuracy (0.2 < bias < 17.9%), precision (relative standard deviation < 17.4%), convenient detection (0.2 mu g/L), and quantification (0.7 mu g/L) limits, as well as linear dynamic ranges (0.8-24.0 mu g/L) with remarkable determination coefficients (R-2 > 0.9926). The proposed analytical method was applied to monitor triazines in three types of corn matrices using the standard addition methodology. Experiments performed in corn samples spiked with triazines at the trace level (8.0 mu g/kg of each analyte) gave rise to recoveries (81.0-119.4%) with good reproducibility and robustness. The proposed methodology is also easy to implement and showed to be a good analytical alternative to monitor triazines in complex matrices, when compared with other sorption-based microextraction techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据