4.5 Article

Magnetic molecularly imprinted composite for the selective solid-phase extraction of p-aminosalicylic acid followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 39, 期 21, 页码 4166-4174

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201600865

关键词

Aminosalicylic acid; Biological matrices; Magnetic nanoparticles; Molecularly imprinted polymers; Selective extraction

资金

  1. Researches Council of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method for the selective extraction of p-aminosalicylic acid from aqueous and urine samples has been developed using magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles before determination by high-performance liquid chromatography. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles were first prepared through the chemical coprecipitation of Fe2+ and Fe3+ and then coated with a vinyl shell. Subsequently, a layer of molecularly imprinted polymers was grafted onto the vinyl-modified magnetic nanoparticles by precipitation polymerization. FTIR spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, vibrating sample magnetometry, and thermogravimetric analysis were applied to characterize the sorbent properties. Moreover, the predominant parameters affecting the magnetic solid phase extraction such as sample pH, sorption and elution times, the amount of sorbent, and composition and volume of eluent were investigated thoroughly. The maximum sorption capacity of the imprinted polymer toward p-aminosalicylic acid was 70.9 mg/g, which is 4.5 times higher than that of the magnetic nonimprinted polymer. The magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles were applied for the selective extraction of p-aminosalicylic acid from aqueous and urine samples and satisfactory results were achieved. The results illustrate that magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles have a great potential in the extraction of p-aminosalicylic acid from environmental and biological matrices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据