4.6 Article

Co-Substituted BiFeO3: Electronic, Ferroelectric, and Thermodynamic Properties from First Principles

期刊

ADVANCED THEORY AND SIMULATIONS
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adts.202200673

关键词

band alignment; bismuth ferrite; photocatalysis; polarization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using density functional theory, this study investigates the thermodynamic, electronic, and ferroelectric properties of BiCoxFe1-xO3 solid solutions. It finds that cobalt substitution can reduce the band gap and increase the spontaneous polarization. The study also discusses the attractive interaction between cobalt impurities and predicts phase separation into a cobalt-rich phase.
Bismuth ferrite, BiFeO3, is a multiferroic solid that is attracting increasing attention as a potential photocatalytic material, because the ferroelectric polarization enhances the separation of photogenerated carriers. With the motivation of finding routes to engineer the band gap and the band alignment, while conserving or enhancing the ferroelectric properties, the thermodynamic, electronic, and ferroelectric properties of BiCoxFe1-xO3 solid solutions (x = 0, 0.0625, 0.125) using density functional theory are investigated. It is shown that the band gap can be reduced from 2.9 to 2.1 eV by cobalt substitution, while simultaneously increasing the spontaneous polarization, which is associated with a notably larger Born effective charge of Co compared to Fe cations. The interaction between Co impurities is discussed, which is strongly attractive and can drive the aggregation of Co, as evidenced by Monte Carlo simulations. Phase separation into a Co-rich phase is therefore predicted to be thermodynamically preferred, and the homogenous solid solution can only exist in metastable form, protected by slow cation diffusion kinetics. Finally, the band alignment of pure and Co-substituted BiFeO3 with relevant redox potentials, in the context of its applicability in photocatalysis, is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据