4.6 Article

Optimum Nitrogen Application Acclimatizes Root Morpho-Physiological Traits and Yield Potential in Rice under Subtropical Conditions

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life12122051

关键词

root length; leaf area index; effective tillers; correlation matrix; yield

资金

  1. Bangladesh Agricultural University Research Systems (BAURES)
  2. [2019/15/BAU]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen is essential for plant root growth and grain yield. A pot experiment with three boro rice varieties and four N doses was conducted to assess their relationship. Results showed that Binadhan-10 had the best root characteristics and highest yield at higher N levels.
Nitrogen (N) is a highly essential macronutrient for plant root growth and grain yield (GY). To assess the relationship among N, root traits, and the yield of boro (dry season irrigated) rice, a pot experiment was performed in the Department of Agronomy, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh, during the boro rice season of 2020-2021. Three boro rice varieties, namely BRRI dhan29, Hira-2, and Binadhan-10, were planted at four N doses: 0 kg ha(-1) (N-0), 70 kg ha(-1) (N-70), 140 kg ha(-1) (N-140), and 210 kg ha(-1) (N-210). The experiment was conducted following a completely randomized design with three replicates. The varieties were evaluated for root number (RN), root length (RL), root volume (RV), root porosity (RP), leaf area index (LAI), total dry matter (TDM), and yield. The results indicated that the Binadhan-10, Hira-2, and BRRI dhan29 varieties produced better root characteristics under at the N-140 and N-210 levels. A substantial positive association was noticed between the grain yield and the root traits, except for root porosity. Based on the root traits and growth dynamics, Binadhan-10 performed the best at the N-140 level and produced the highest grain yield (26.96 g pot(-1)), followed by Hira-2 (26.35 g pot(-1)) and BRRI dhan29 (25.90 g pot(-1)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据