4.5 Review

The Advancement in Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Technology toward Sustainable Industrial Wastewater Management

期刊

MEMBRANES
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/membranes13020181

关键词

membrane bioreactor (MBR); structural features; selection criteria; operational constraints; sustainable water treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The advancement of water treatment technology has led to the revolution of membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology. MBR has overcome the limitations of traditional activated sludge process in terms of space requirement, efficiency, and cost. Immersed and side-stream MBR can replace the conventional activated sludge (CAS) process and tertiary filtration. The efficiency of MBR is influenced by various factors such as membrane surface properties, permeate flux, retention time, pH, alkalinity, temperature, and cleaning frequency.
The advancement in water treatment technology has revolutionized the progress of membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology in the modern era. The large space requirement, low efficiency, and high cost of the traditional activated sludge process have given the necessary space for the MBR system to come into action. The conventional activated sludge (CAS) process and tertiary filtration can be replaced by immersed and side-stream MBR. This article outlines the historical advancement of the MBR process in the treatment of industrial and municipal wastewaters. The structural features and design parameters of MBR, e.g., membrane surface properties, permeate flux, retention time, pH, alkalinity, temperature, cleaning frequency, etc., highly influence the efficiency of the MBR process. The submerged MBR can handle lower permeate flux (requires less power), whereas the side-stream MBR can handle higher permeate flux (requires more power). However, MBR has some operational issues with conventional water treatment technologies. The quality of sludge, equipment requirements, and fouling are major drawbacks of the MBR process. This review paper also deals with the approach to address these constraints. However, given the energy limitations, climatic changes, and resource depletion, conventional wastewater treatment systems face significant obstacles. When compared with CAS, MBR has better permeate quality, simpler operational management, and a reduced footprint requirement. Thus, for sustainable water treatment, MBR can be an efficient tool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据