4.7 Article

The Impact of Metal-Based Nanoparticles Produced by Different Types of Underwater Welding on Marine Microalgae

期刊

TOXICS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxics11020105

关键词

toxicity; bioassay; underwater welding; flow cytometry; welding wire; risk assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the aquatic toxicity of two suspension samples obtained from underwater welding using electrode and flux-cored wire on marine microalgae Attheya ussuriensis and Porphyridium purpureum. The results showed that the suspension obtained from welding with electrode had an acute toxic impact on A. ussuriensis, while both suspensions had chronic toxicity with a 40% growth rate inhibition in this microalga. However, P. purpureum showed tolerance to both suspensions due to the presence of an exopolysaccharide covering that prevented the toxic impact of metal cations.
Underwater wet welding is commonly used in joining pipelines and in underwater construction. Harmful and hazardous compounds are added to many flux-cored wires for underwater welding and cutting, and can have a negative impact on marine life. The specific objective of this study was to evaluate the aquatic toxicity of two suspension samples obtained using welding electrode and flux-cored wire in marine microalgae Attheya ussuriensis and Porphyridium purpureum. Growth rate inhibition, cell size, and biochemical changes in microalgae were evaluated by flow cytometry. The results of the bioassay demonstrated that the suspension obtained after welding with electrode had an acute toxic impact on diatomic microalgae A. ussuriensis, and both tested suspensions revealed chronic toxicity in this microalga with a 40% growth rate inhibition after exposure to 40-50% of prepared suspensions for 7 days. Red algae P. purpureum revealed tolerance to both suspensions caused by exopolysaccharide covering, which prevents the toxic impact of metal cations such as Al, Ti, Mn, Fe, and Zn, which are considered the main toxic components of underwater welding emissions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据