4.4 Article

Assessing Diversity and Inclusivity is the Next Frontier in Mental Health Recovery Narrative Research and Practice

期刊

JMIR MENTAL HEALTH
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/44601

关键词

recovery narrative; web-based mental health interventions; inclusivity; diversity; collective action; curation; mental health; digital health; telemedicine; clinical practice; narrative research; demographic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Demand for digital health interventions is increasing globally. The use of recorded mental health recovery narratives is becoming more common in digital health interventions. These narratives provide a first-person account of recovery from mental health problems and can have helpful impacts such as validation of experiences. However, there is a need to ensure diversity and inclusivity in narrative collections to maximize benefits and minimize harm to service users.
Demand for digital health interventions is increasing in many countries. The use of recorded mental health recovery narratives in digital health interventions is becoming more widespread in clinical practice. Mental health recovery narratives are first-person lived experience accounts of recovery from mental health problems, including struggles and successes over time. Helpful impacts of recorded mental health recovery narratives include connectedness with the narrative and validation of experiences. Possible harms include feeling disconnected and excluded from others. Diverse narrative collections from many types of narrators and describing multiple ways to recover are important to maximize the opportunity for service users to benefit through connection and to minimize the likelihood of harm. Mental health clinicians need to know whether narrative collections are sufficiently diverse to recommend to service users. However, no method exists for assessing the diversity and inclusivity of existing or new narrative collections. We argue that assessing diversity and inclusivity is the next frontier in mental health recovery narrative research and practice. This is important, but methodologically and ethically complex. In this viewpoint, we propose and evaluate one diversity and two inclusivity assessment methods. The diversity assessment method involves use of the Simpson Diversity Index. The two inclusivity assessment methods are based on comparator demographic rates and arbitrary thresholds, respectively. These methods were applied to four narrative collections as a case study. Refinements are needed regarding a narrative assessment tool in terms of its practicality and cultural adaptation.(JMIR Ment Health 2023;10:e44601) doi: 10.2196/44601

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据