4.5 Article

Pregabalin Silences Oxaliplatin-Activated Sensory Neurons to Relieve Cold Allodynia

期刊

ENEURO
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0395-22.2022

关键词

oxaliplatin; pain; pregabalin; sensory neurons; silent nociceptors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxaliplatin can cause cold and mechanical allodynia in patients, and this study found that it unmasks silent Nav1.8-positive nociceptive cold sensors, which is causally linked to cold allodynia. Pregabalin, when intravenously injected, significantly improves cold allodynia by reducing the number of cold sensitive neurons and changing their excitability and temperature thresholds. Deletion of a28 1 subunits abolishes the effects of pregabalin on cold allodynia and the silencing of sensory neurons, indicating a novel peripheral inhibitory effect of pregabalin on silent cold-sensing neurons in oxaliplatin-dependent cold allodynia.
Oxaliplatin is a platinum-based chemotherapeutic agent that causes cold and mechanical allodynia in up to 90% of patients. Silent Nav1.8-positive nociceptive cold sensors have been shown to be unmasked by oxaliplatin, and this event has been causally linked to the development of cold allodynia. We examined the effects of pregabalin on oxali-platin-evoked unmasking of cold sensitive neurons using mice expressing GCaMP-3 in all sensory neurons. Intravenous injection of pregabalin significantly ameliorates cold allodynia, while decreasing the number of cold sensi-tive neurons by altering their excitability and temperature thresholds. The silenced neurons are predominantly me-dium/large mechano-cold sensitive neurons, corresponding to the silent cold sensors activated during neuropathy. Deletion of a28 1 subunits abolished the effects of pregabalin on both cold allodynia and the silencing of sensory neurons. Thus, these results define a novel, peripheral inhibitory effect of pregabalin on the excitability of silent cold-sensing neurons in a model of oxaliplatin-dependent cold allodynia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据