4.6 Article

Human-Multirobot Collaborative Mobile Manipulation: The Omnid Mocobots

期刊

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 376-383

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3226366

关键词

Swarm robotics; human-robot collaborative manipulation; physical human-robot interaction; multirobot systems

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Omnid human-collaborative mobile manipulators are experimental platforms designed to test control architectures for autonomous and human-collaborative multirobot mobile manipulation. They consist of a mecanum-wheel omnidirectional mobile base and a series-elastic Delta-type parallel manipulator. The mocobots are designed with passive compliance for safety and high-fidelity end-effector force control.
The Omnid human-collaborative mobile manipulators are an experimental platform for testing control architectures for autonomous and human-collaborative multirobot mobile manipulation. An Omnid consists of a mecanum-wheel omnidirectional mobile base and a series-elastic Delta-type parallel manipulator, and it is a specific implementation of a broader class of mobile collaborative robots ( mocobots ) suitable for safe human co-manipulation of delicate, flexible, and articulated payloads. Key features of mocobots include passive compliance, for the safety of the human and the payload, and high-fidelity end-effector force control independent of the potentially imprecise motions of the mobile base. We describe general considerations for the design of teams of mocobots; the design of the Omnids in light of these considerations; manipulator and mobile base controllers to achieve multirobot collaborative behaviors; and experiments in human-multirobot collaborative mobile manipulation of large and articulated payloads, where the mocobot team renders the payloads weightless for effortless human co-manipulation. In these experiments, the only communication among the humans and Omnids is mechanical, through the payload.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据