4.7 Article

The chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 and PM10 in a typical city of Northeast China

期刊

URBAN CLIMATE
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101373

关键词

PM2.5 and PM10; Source apportionment; Secondary aerosol; Positive matrix factorization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the chemical characteristics of PM2.5 and PM10 in a typical city of Northeast China during the heating period, including trace elements, water-soluble inorganic ions (WSII), organic carbon (OC), and element carbon (EC). The results showed that concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were 66.55 +/- 28.89 μg/m^3 and 92.99 +/- 31.00 μg/m^3, respectively. The concentrations of As and Cr in the atmosphere exceeded the current air quality standards in China. Secondary inorganic ions (NH4+, NO3-, and SO42-) dominated the WSII, accounting for a significant percentage of PM2.5 and PM10. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) identified six sources of PM2.5 and PM10, with secondary aerosol being the largest contributor.
This paper analyzed the chemical characterization of PM2.5 and PM10 in a typical city of Northeast China during the heating period, including trace elements, water-soluble inorganic ions (WSII), organic carbon (OC), and element carbon (EC). The results showed that PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations were 66.55 +/- 28.89 mu g/m(3) and 92.99 +/- 31.00 mu g/m(3). The concentrations of As and Cr in the atmosphere were beyond the current air quality standard in China (6 ng/m(3) for As, 0.025 ng/m(3) for Cr). Secondary inorganic ions (NH4+, NO3-, and SO42-) dominated the WSII, accounting for 40.54% of PM2.5 and 33.80% of PM10. High OC/EC ratios implied a high proportion of secondary organic carbon (SOC). Positive matrix factorization (PMF) was used to identify the sources of PM2.5 and PM10. Six factors were analyzed and identified as secondary aerosol, industry, coal combustion, vehicle emissions, biomass burning, and dust, of which secondary aerosol was the largest contribution to PM2.5 and PM10.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据