4.6 Article

Verteporfin reverses progestin resistance through YAP/TAZ-PI3K-Akt pathway in endometrial carcinoma

期刊

CELL DEATH DISCOVERY
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41420-023-01319-y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Progestin resistance is a problem for patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) who require conservative treatment with progestin, and the underlying mechanisms are unclear. This study found that YAP/TAZ, downstream transcription coactivators of Hippo pathway, were upregulated in progestin resistant tissues and played a role in promoting progestin resistance by regulating the PI3K-Akt pathway.
Progestin resistance is a problem for patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) who require conservative treatment with progestin, and its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. YAP and TAZ (YAP/TAZ), downstream transcription coactivators of Hippo pathway, promote viability, metastasis and also drug resistance of malignant tumors. According to our microarray analysis, YAP/TAZ were upregulated in progestin resistant IshikawaPR cell versus progestin sensitive Ishikawa cell, which implied that YAP/TAZ may be a vital promotor of resistance to progestin. We found YAP/TAZ had higher expression levels among the resistant tissues than sensitive tissues. In addition, knocking down YAP/TAZ decreased cell viability, inhibited cell migration and invasion and increased the sensitivity of IshikawaPR cell to progestin. On the contrary, overexpression of YAP/TAZ increased cell proliferation, metastasis and promoted progestin resistance. We also confirmed YAP/TAZ were involved in progestin resistant process by regulating PI3K-Akt pathway. Furthermore, Verteporfin as an inhibitor of YAP/TAZ could increase sensitivity of IshikawaPR cells to progestin in vivo and in vitro. Our study for the first time indicated that YAP/TAZ play an important role in progestin resistance by regulating PI3K-Akt pathway in EC, which may provide ideas for clinical targeted therapy of progestin resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据