4.7 Article

MME+ fibro-adipogenic progenitors are the dominant adipogenic population during fatty infiltration in human skeletal muscle

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04504-y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the heterogeneity of FAP cells in patients with fatty infiltration was characterized using single-nuclei and single-cell RNA sequencing. An MME+ FAP subpopulation with high adipogenic potential was identified, which showed resistance to WNT activators. It was also found that many MME+ FAP cells undergo apoptosis during muscle regeneration and differentiate into adipocytes under pathological conditions.
Fatty infiltration, the ectopic deposition of adipose tissue within skeletal muscle, is mediated via the adipogenic differentiation of fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs). We used single-nuclei and single-cell RNA sequencing to characterize FAP heterogeneity in patients with fatty infiltration. We identified an MME+ FAP subpopulation which, based on ex vivo characterization as well as transplantation experiments, exhibits high adipogenic potential. MME+ FAPs are characterized by low activity of WNT, known to control adipogenic commitment, and are refractory to the inhibitory role of WNT activators. Using preclinical models for muscle damage versus fatty infiltration, we show that many MME+ FAPs undergo apoptosis during muscle regeneration and differentiate into adipocytes under pathological conditions, leading to a reduction in their abundance. Finally, we utilized the varying fat infiltration levels in human hip muscles and found less MME+ FAPs in fatty infiltrated human muscle. Altogether, we have identified the dominant adipogenic FAP subpopulation in skeletal muscle. Using single nuclei and single cell RNA-seq, 3 FAP cell subpopulations are identified in human skeletal muscle, with an MME+ subset showing increased adipogenic potential under fatty infiltration conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据