4.6 Article

Isotopic Radiolabeling of Crizotinib with Fluorine-18 for In Vivo Pet Imaging

期刊

PHARMACEUTICALS
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph15121568

关键词

fluorine-18; radiolabeling; crizotinib; PET imaging

资金

  1. [ANR-11-INBS-0006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A spirocyclic hypervalent iodine precursor was synthesized for the isotopic labeling of Crizotinib, and PET imaging demonstrated the feasibility of [F-18](R)-Crizotinib for in vivo imaging. The study suggests that this method can be used for further research on enhancing the brain penetration of Crizotinib.
Crizotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer, but it is inefficient on brain metastases. Crizotinib is a substrate of the P-glycoprotein, and non-invasive nuclear imaging can be used to assess the brain penetration of crizotinib. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using fluorine-18-labeled crizotinib would be a powerful tool for investigating new strategies to enhance the brain distribution of crizotinib. We have synthesized a spirocyclic hypervalent iodine precursor for the isotopic labeling of crizotinib in a 2.4% yield. Because crizotinib is an enantiomerically pure drug, a chiral separation was performed to afford the (R)-precursor. A two-step radiolabeling process was optimized and automated using the racemic precursor to afford [F-18](R,S)-crizotinib in 15 +/- 2 radiochemical yield and 103 +/- 18 GBq/mu mol molar activity. The same radiolabeling process was applied to the (R)-precursor to afford [F-18](R)-crizotinib with comparable results. As a proof-of-concept, PET was realized in a single non-human primate to demonstrate the feasibility of [F-18](R)-crizotinib in in vivo imaging. Whole-body PET highlighted the elimination routes of crizotinib with negligible penetration in the brain (SUVmean = 0.1). This proof-of-concept paves the way for further studies using [F-18](R)-crizotinib to enhance its brain penetration depending on the P-glycoprotein function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据