4.6 Article

New 5-Aryl-1,3,4-Thiadiazole-Based Anticancer Agents: Design, Synthesis, In Vitro Biological Evaluation and In Vivo Radioactive Tracing Studies

期刊

PHARMACEUTICALS
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph15121476

关键词

1; 3; 4-thiadiazole; anticancer activity; structure-activity relationship; radiolabeling; in vivo pharmacokinetics

资金

  1. Science Technology Development Fund (STDF)- Applied Science Research, Cairo, Egypt [46045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new series of 5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole-based compounds were synthesized and evaluated for their cytotoxicity potential and selectivity against cancer cells. Compounds 4e and 4i showed the highest activity against the tested cancer cells and displayed selective cytotoxicity. Treatment with these compounds induced cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death. Compound 4i showed targeting ability to sarcoma cells in a tumor-bearing mice model.
A new series of 5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole-based compounds featuring pyridinium (3), substituted piperazines (4a-g), benzyl piperidine (4i), and aryl aminothiazoles (5a-e) heterocycles were synthesized. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity potential of the new compounds against MCF-7 and HepG2 cancer cell lines indicated that compounds 4e and 4i displayed the highest activity toward the tested cancer cells. A selectivity study demonstrated the high selective cytotoxicity of 4e and 4i towards cancerous cells over normal mammalian Vero cells. Cell cycle analysis revealed that treatment with either compound 4e or 4i induced cell cycle arrest at the S and G2/M phases in HepG2 and MCF-7 cells, respectively. Moreover, the significant increase in the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio and caspase 9 levels in HepG2 and MCF-7 cells treated with either 4e or 4i indicated that their cytotoxic effect is attributed to the ability to induce apoptotic cell death. Finally, an in vivo radioactive tracing study of compound 4i proved its targeting ability to sarcoma cells in a tumor-bearing mice model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据