4.7 Article

Adverse Effects in Patients with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Hospitalized at the University Clinical Hospital

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12111898

关键词

care quality; patient safety; adverse effects; persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (PwIDD) are at high risk of experiencing adverse effects (AEs) while receiving healthcare assistance due to their high social and clinical vulnerability. Healthcare practitioners need to be aware of these results and take them into consideration in order to provide personalized, preventive, competent, effective, and safe medical care.
(1) Background: Providing the patient with the health care they need in a personalized and appropriate manner and without adverse effects (AEs) is a part of quality of care and patient safety. The aim of this applied research project was the assessment of AEs as a clinical risk in patients with high social vulnerability such as persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (PwIDD). (2) Methods: A retrospective epidemiological cohort study was performed on exposed and unexposed groups (the control group) in order to estimate the incidence of AEs in PwIDDs and assess their importance for this category of patients. (3) Results: AEs were observed with a frequency of 30.4% (95% CI) in the PwIDD exposed group, with significant differences to the unexposed group (p = 0.009). No differences were observed with regards to gender. Age was as a marker of care risk, with the highest incidence of AEs in the group of 60-69 years. (4) Conclusions: PwIDDs have a high risk of suffering AEs while receiving health care assistance due to their high social and clinical vulnerability. Health care practitioners must therefore be aware of these results and keep these observations in mind in order to carry out personalized, preventive, competent, effective, and safe medical care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据