4.7 Review

Biobanking as a Tool for Genomic Research: From Allele Frequencies to Cross-Ancestry Association Studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12122040

关键词

biobank; genomics; GWAS; meta-analysis; allele frequency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the advancements in collection, storage, and analysis of biological samples, many countries have established large biobanks, which play a significant role in medical genetics and genomic research. They provide reference allele frequency information and enable large-scale cross-ancestry meta-analyses. Biobanks are extensively used in genomics for genome-wide association analysis, genetic epidemiology, and statistical research into the structure, function, and evolution of the human genome.
In recent years, great advances have been made in the field of collection, storage, and analysis of biological samples. Large collections of samples, biobanks, have been established in many countries. Biobanks typically collect large amounts of biological samples and associated clinical information; the largest collections include over a million samples. In this review, we summarize the main directions in which biobanks aid medical genetics and genomic research, from providing reference allele frequency information to allowing large-scale cross-ancestry meta-analyses. The largest biobanks greatly vary in the size of the collection, and the amount of available phenotype and genotype data. Nevertheless, all of them are extensively used in genomics, providing a rich resource for genome-wide association analysis, genetic epidemiology, and statistical research into the structure, function, and evolution of the human genome. Recently, multiple research efforts were based on trans-biobank data integration, which increases sample size and allows for the identification of robust genetic associations. We provide prominent examples of such data integration and discuss important caveats which have to be taken into account in trans-biobank research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据