4.7 Article

Altered White Matter Network Topology in Panic Disorder

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020227

关键词

panic disorder; white matter; network topology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the specific characteristics of the structural brain network in patients with panic disorder (PD) using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and graph theory analysis. The results show that PD patients have higher network efficiency, lower shortest path length, and lower clustering coefficient at the global level compared to healthy controls. At the nodal level, PD patients exhibit higher nodal efficiency and lower average shortest path length in regions such as the prefrontal cortex, sensorimotor cortex, limbic system, insula, and cerebellum. These findings suggest that alterations in the fear network's information processing may contribute to the pathophysiology of PD.
Panic disorder (PD) is an anxiety disorder that impairs life quality and social function and is associated with distributed brain regions. However, the alteration of the structural network remains unclear in PD patients. This study explored the specific characteristics of the structural brain network in patients with PD by graph theory analysis of diffusion tensor images (DTI). A total of 81 PD patients and 48 matched healthy controls were recruited for this study. The structural networks were constructed, and the network topological properties for individuals were estimated. At the global level, the network efficiency was higher, while the shortest path length and clustering coefficient were lower in the PD group compared to the healthy control (HC) group. At the nodal level, the PD group showed a widespread higher nodal efficiency and lower average shortest path length in the prefrontal, sensorimotor, limbic, insula, and cerebellum regions. Overall, the current results showed that the alteration of information processing in the fear network might play a role in the pathophysiology of PD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据