4.7 Article

Synthetic Strategy of Si@void@C Nanoparticles for High- Performance Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 11, 页码 14476-14486

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.2c03048

关键词

silicon; void space; carbon; anode; lithium-ion batteries

资金

  1. Open Project of Key Lab Adv. Energy Mat [20201022032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Si@void@C nanoparticles with a carbon layer and yolk-void-shell structure are successfully synthesized using a ZnO template and mild synthesis strategy. The carbon layer improves material conductivity and blocks silicon from the electrolyte, while the yolk-void-shell structure accommodates silicon volume expansion during cycling. Compared to traditional synthesis methods, these nanoparticles exhibit better cycle and rate performances.
Silicon anode materials have the absolute predom-inance of high theoretical specific capacity, but its conductivity is low. What is more, the huge volume expansion (similar to 300%) of silicon during cycling causes rapid capacity fading. Herein, high-perform-ance Si@void@C nanoparticles are synthesized by a unique ZnO template and mild strategy for the first time. Compared with the traditional synthesis method, a milder and environmentally friendly synthesis strategy provides a new feasible scheme for the large-scale commercialization of silicon anodes. The carbon layer blocks the silicon from the electrolyte and improves the conductivity of materials, and the yolk-void-shell structure accommodates the volume expansion of silicon during cycling. Si@void@C nanoparticles prepared with the ZnO template show excellent cycle and rate performances compared with the traditional synthetic strategy. After 500 cycles, the specific capacity of Si@void@C still maintains 934 mA h g-1 at 1 A g-1, and the average specific capacity is as high as 1125.4 mA h g-1 at a high current density of 4 A g-1. To sum up, the potential of Si@void@C anode for lithium-ion batteries cannot be underestimated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据