4.7 Article

Performances of Co2+-Substituted NiMoO4 Nanorods in a Solid-State Hybrid Supercapacitor

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 1321-1331

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.2c03067

关键词

transition metal molybdate; electrical conductivity; cyclic stability; hybrid supercapacitor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ni(1-alpha)Co(alpha)MoO4 (alpha = 0, 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 M) nanorods were successfully synthesized via a hydrothermal method and proved to be excellent electrode materials for a hybrid supercapacitor. The electrochemical properties of the nanorods were found to be dependent on the Ni/Co ratio, as shown by various electrochemical techniques. Ni0.5Co0.5MoO4 (alpha = 0.5 M) exhibited a specific capacity (Qg) of 354 Cg-1@1 Ag-1 with a notable retention capacity of 92% after 8000 repeated cycles at 10 Ag-1. Ni0.5Co0.5MoO4 with a high surface area outperformed mono-metallic (NiMoO4) and bimetallic (Ni0.9Co0.1MoO4 and Ni0.7Co0.3MoO4) nanostructures. The hybrid supercapacitor (Ni0.5Co0.5MoO4//activated carbon) delivered a maximum Qcell of 53 Cg-1 at 1 Ag-1 with an energy density of 16.2 Wh kg-1 and a power density of 725 W kg-1.
A hydrothermal method was conducted to synthesize Ni(1-alpha)Co(alpha)MoO4 (alpha = 0, 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 M) nanorods, which were proven as excellent electrode materials in a hybrid supercapacitor. Their electrochemical properties were also dependent on the Ni/Co ratio as demonstrated by different electrochemical techniques. Ni0.5Co0.5MoO4 (alpha = 0.5 M) offered specific capacity (Qg) = 354 Cg-1@1 Ag-1, a remarkable specific capacity with a notable retention capacity of 92% after 8000 repeated cycles at 10 Ag-1. Ni0.5Co0.5MoO4 with a high surface area outperformed the mono-metallic (NiMoO4) and bimetallic (Ni0.9Co0.1MoO4 and Ni0.7Co0.3MoO4) nanostructures. The hybrid supercapacitor (Ni0.5Co0.5MoO4//activated carbon) delivered a maximum Qcell of 53 Cg-1 at 1 Ag-1 with an energy density of 16.2 Wh kg-1 and power density of 725 W kg-1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据