4.7 Article

CpG Site-Based Signature Predicts Survival of Colorectal Cancer

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123163

关键词

DNA methylation; signatures pathways; predictive survival; colorectal cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the use of DNA methylation for predicting survival in colorectal cancer (CRC). The researchers discovered signatures of CpG sites and genes associated with CRC and predictive of survival. Functional analysis revealed molecular networks and signaling pathways driving clinical outcomes.
Background: A critical unmet medical need in clinical management of colorectal cancer (CRC) pivots around lack of noninvasive and or minimally invasive techniques for early diagnosis and prognostic prediction of clinical outcomes. Because DNA methylation can capture the regulatory landscape of tumors and can be measured in body fluids, it provides unparalleled opportunities for the discovery of early diagnostic and prognostics markers predictive of clinical outcomes. Here we investigated use of DNA methylation for the discovery of potential clinically actionable diagnostic and prognostic markers for predicting survival in CRC. Methods: We analyzed DNA methylation patterns between tumor and control samples to discover signatures of CpG sites and genes associated with CRC and predictive of survival. We conducted functional analysis to identify molecular networks and signaling pathways driving clinical outcomes. Results: We discovered a signature of aberrantly methylated genes associated with CRC and a signature of thirteen (13) CpG sites predictive of survival. We discovered molecular networks and signaling pathways enriched for CpG sites likely to drive clinical outcomes. Conclusions: The investigation revealed that CpG sites can predict survival in CRC and that DNA methylation can capture the regulatory state of tumors through aberrantly methylated molecular networks and signaling pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据