4.7 Article

Multiple Sclerosis and MEN2 Neoplasia in a Female Patient: A Unique Co-Existence with Expanded Immunological Interest and Therapeutical Challenges, before and after Patient's COVID-19 Infection

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112850

关键词

multiple sclerosis; pediatric-onset; MEN2; neoplasia; rare diseases; HLA; KIR; PD-1; immunopathogenesis; immunotherapeutics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a case of a female patient with pediatric-onset MS and multiple endocrine neoplasia 2B, and analyzes the immunological impact of these diseases on therapeutical choice. The study suggests that an anti-CD20 agent may be the most suitable treatment for this case.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) and its various comorbidities that may be observed are of great interest due to the complexity of MS pathophysiology and all of the immunological changes that follow. The incidence of cancer in MS has been investigated for several years, as not only does it affect ongoing therapeutical decisions, but also, certain disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) may increase the risk of tumorigenesis. For the first time, we present a case of a female patient with pediatric-onset MS (POMS) and multiple endocrine neoplasia 2B (MEN2B) and analyze the immunological impact of these diseases on the therapeutical choice, under the umbrella of her COVID-19 infection and the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic as a whole. We also review the existing literature regarding the immunogenetic and immunological correlations between these two extremely rare diseases and discuss the most suitable treatment for our case, which seems to be an anti-CD20 agent due to a better outcome in putative MS worsening and tumor progression, when killer immunoglobulin-like receptors' (KIR) expression is reduced in natural killer (NK) cells. We also broaden our concerns on this comorbidity issue, at the same time focusing on the future research needed in this unexplored field of the comorbidity of MS and cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据