4.7 Article

Intra-Arterial Urokinase for Acute Superior Mesenteric Artery Occlusion: A Retrospective 12-Year Report of 13 Cases

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020267

关键词

intra-arterial urokinase; superior mesenteric artery occlusion; thrombolysis; recanalisation degree; bowel perfusion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of 13 patients with acute superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion who underwent intra-arterial urokinase thrombolysis. The study found that urokinase therapy restored bowel perfusion and preserved bowel in six patients, but failed in the other seven patients. Significant differences were observed in the degree of SMA occlusion, the degree of recanalisation, and the length of stay between the complete and incomplete occlusion groups. In cases of complete SMA occlusion, surgery was warranted, while urokinase thrombolysis may serve as an adjunctive treatment for cases of incomplete SMA occlusion.
This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of 13 patients with acute superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion who underwent intra-arterial urokinase thrombolysis between 2008 and 2020. On angiography, seven presented with complete SMA occlusion versus six with incomplete occlusion. The median time from abdominal pain to attempting urokinase thrombolysis was 15.0 h (interquartile range, 6.0 h). After urokinase therapy, bowel perfusion was restored with bowel preservation in six patients; however, treatment failed in the other seven patients. The degree of SMA occlusion (complete vs. incomplete, p = 0.002), degree of recanalisation (p = 0.012), and length of stay (p = 0.032) differed significantly between groups. Of the seven patients with complete SMA occlusion, six underwent bowel resection, of whom three died, and the remaining patient died of shock due to delayed surgery. Among the six patients with incomplete SMA occlusion, no bowel resection was performed. In our experience, intra-arterial urokinase thrombolysis may serve as an adjunctive treatment modality, being a potential replacement for open thrombectomy that is able to preserve the bowel and obviate surgery in cases of incomplete SMA occlusion; however, its use is unsuitable in cases of complete SMA occlusion, for which surgery is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据