4.7 Review

Eph Receptors in Cancer

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020315

关键词

Eph receptor; ephrin; receptor tyrosine kinase; cancer biology; targeted therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eph receptor tyrosine kinases play critical roles in development and tissue formation, and are regulated by membrane-bound ligands ephrins. They have low expression in adults, but are often overexpressed in cancers, where they are associated with tumour development, vasculature, and invasion. Understanding the opposing roles of Ephs in different cancers is crucial for developing targeted therapies.
Eph receptor tyrosine kinases play critical functions during development, in the formation of tissue and organ borders, and the vascular and neural systems. Uniquely among tyrosine kinases, their activities are controlled by binding to membrane-bound ligands, called ephrins. Ephs and ephrins generally have a low expression in adults, functioning mainly in tissue homeostasis and plasticity, but are often overexpressed in cancers, where they are especially associated with undifferentiated or progenitor cells, and with tumour development, vasculature, and invasion. Mutations in Eph receptors also occur in various tumour types and are suspected to promote tumourigenesis. Ephs and ephrins have the capacity to operate as both tumour promoters and tumour suppressors, depending on the circumstances. They have been demonstrated to impact tumour cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro, as well as tumour development, angiogenesis, and metastases in vivo, making them potential therapeutic targets. However, successful development of therapies will require detailed understanding of the opposing roles of Ephs in various cancers. In this review, we discuss the variations in Eph expression and functions in a variety of malignancies. We also describe the multiple strategies that are currently available to target them in tumours, including preclinical and clinical development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据