4.7 Review

Onset of Action of Selected Second-Generation Antipsychotics (Pines)-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11010082

关键词

antipsychotic action; antipsychotic effect; antipsychotic agents; pines; psychopharmacology; schizophrenia; systematic review; meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recommendations for duration of treatment with antipsychotics before considering a switch range from 2 to 8 weeks. This study estimated the time to onset and maximum antipsychotic effect of asenapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, and zotepine. The results showed that the antipsychotic effect of these medications begins to show after one week, reaches its peak at three weeks, and levels off by the sixth week.
Recommendations for duration of treatment with antipsychotics before considering a switch vary from 2 to 8 weeks, although several studies suggest a rapid onset of action. The objective of this review was to estimate time to onset of action and time to maximum antipsychotic effect of asenapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, and zotepine (pines). We searched bibliographic databases for randomized, placebo-controlled trials in adults with schizophrenia estimating the antipsychotic effect of pines over time. Thirty-five studies including 6331 patients diagnosed with chronic schizophrenia were included. We estimated the standardized mean differences (SMD) of changes in symptom score from baseline to follow-up between intervention and placebo groups across studies using meta-analysis techniques. The summarized effect across all included pines administered as immediate-release formulations showed a statistically significant effect at week 1 (SMD, -0.20 [CI95% -0.28, -0.13]), which increased until week 3 (SMD, -0.42 [CI95% -0.50, -0.34]), after which the effect leveled off (week 6: SMD, -0.53 [CI95% -0.62, -0.44]). The sensitivity analyses of the individual pines confirm this finding, although data sparsity increases variability and limits conclusiveness of these analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据