4.5 Article

Characterization of Changes in Penile Microbiome Following Pediatric Circumcision

期刊

EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 669-680

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.007

关键词

Circumcision; Microbiome; Mycobiome; 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to analyze the changes in penile microbiome before and after circumcision in pediatric population and evaluate the pathways related to inflammation, barrier protection, and energy metabolism. The results showed a significant reduction in bacteria and fungi after circumcision, especially anaerobic bacteria, which are potential inducers of inflammation and cancer. This is the first study to demonstrate the changes in microbiome after circumcision and provide explanations for the differences in cancer and inflammatory disorders in adulthood among healthy infants after circumcision.
Background: While microbiome and host regulation contribute independently to many disease states, it is unclear how circumcision in pediatric population influences subse-quent changes in penile microbiome.Objective: Our study aims to analyze jointly paired taxonomic profiles and assess path-ways implicated in inflammation, barrier protection, and energy metabolism.Design, setting, and participants: We analyzed 11 paired samples, periurethral collection, before and after circumcision, to generate microbiome and mycobiome profiling. Sample preparation of 16S ribosomal RNA and internal transcribed spacer sequencing was adapted from the methods developed by the National Institutes of Health Human Microbiome Project.Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We obtained the predictive functional attributes of the microbial communities between samples using Silva-Tax4Fun and the Greengenes-Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) approach. The predictive functioning of the microbial com-munities was determined by linearly combining the normalized taxonomic abundances into the precomputed association matrix of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes orthology reference profiles.Results and limitations: Several notable microbiome and mycobiome compositional dif-ferences were observed between pre-and postcircumcision patients. Pairwise compar-isons across taxa revealed a significant decrease (p < 0.05, false discovery rate corrected) of microbiome organisms (Clostridiales, Bacteroidales, and Campylobacterales) and mycobiome (Saccharomycetales and Pleosporales) following circumcision. A total of 14 pathways were found to differ in abundance between the pre and postcircumcision groups (p < 0.005, false discovery rate <0.1 and linear discriminant analysis score >3; five enriched and nine depleted). The pathways reduced after circumcision were mostly involved with amino acid and glucose metabolism, while pathways prior to circumcision were enriched in genetic information processing and transcription processes. As expected, enrichment in methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein, an integral membrane protein involved in directed motility of microbes to chemical cues and environment, occurred prior to circumcision, while the filamentous hemagglutinin pathway (a strong immunogenic protein) was depleted after circumcision Conclusions: Our results offer greater insight into the host-microbiota relationship of penile circumcision and may serve to lay the groundwork for future studies focused on drivers of inflammation, infection, and oncogenesis.Patient summary: Our study showed a significant reduction in bacteria and fungi after circumcision, particularly anaerobic bacteria, which are known to be potential inducers of inflammation and cancer. This is the first study of its kind showing the changes in microbiome after circumcision, and some of the changes that occur in healthy infants after circumcision that may explain the differences in cancer and inflammatory disorders in adulthood.(c) 2022 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据