4.6 Article

Age-Bilirubin-International Normalized Ratio (INR)-Creatinine (ABIC) Score, a Potential Prognostic Model for Long-Term Mortality of CAD Patients After PCI

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATION RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 333-341

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S394502

关键词

age-bilirubin-international normalized ratio-creatinine score; ABIC score; coronary artery disease; mortality; prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ABIC score is a potential prognostic model for patients with CAD who have undergone PCI, as it predicts high long-term mortality and cardiac death risk.
Background: Given that age, international normalized ratio (INR), total bilirubin, and creatinine are reported to be independent risk factors for predicting outcome in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), it is possible that the age-bilirubin-INR-creatinine (ABIC) score might be a potential prognostic model for patients with CAD.Methods: A total of 6046 CAD patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from the retrospective cohort study (Identifier: ChiCTR-ORC-16010153) were evaluated finally. The primary outcome long-term mortality and secondary endpoints mainly major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were recorded. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to determine risk factors for mortality and MACCEs.Results: The ABIC score was significantly higher in the death group than in the survival group. After adjusting for other CAD risk factors, the ABIC score was identified to be an independent risk factor for long-term mortality by multivariate Cox analysis. When in the high ABIC group, the incidence of all-cause mortality would increased 1.7 times (adjusted HR=1.729 (1.347-2.218), P<0.001), and 1.5 times for cardiac death (adjusted HR=1.482 (1.126-1.951), P=0.005). Conclusion: The present study indicated that ABIC score >= 7.985 predicts high long-term mortality and cardiac death risk for PCI patients. The ABIC score might be a potential prognostic model for patients with PCI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据