Safety of Withholding Perioperative Hydrocortisone for Patients With Pituitary Adenomas With an Intact Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE Pituitary adenoma is the second most common primary brain tumor. Perioperative hydrocortisone has been used for decades to avoid postoperative adrenal insufficiency. Recent studies suggest that withholding perioperative hydrocortisone may be safe for patients with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety of withholding hydrocortisone during the perioperative period of pituitary adenoma surgery for patients with an intact HPA axis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A parallel-group, triple-masked, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from November 1, 2020, to January 31, 2022, among 436 patients aged 18 to 70 years with an intact H PA axis undergoing surgery for pituitary adenomas. INTERVENTIONS Hydrocortisone supplementation protocol (intravenous and subsequent oral hydrocortisone, using a taper program) or no-hydrocortisone protocol. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the incidence of new-onset adrenal insufficiency (morningcortisol level, <5 mu g/dL with adrenal insufficiency-related symptoms) during the perioperative period (on the day of operation and the following 2 days). The secondary outcome was the incidence of adrenal insufficiency in postoperative month 3. Analysis was on an intentionto-treat basis. RESULTS Of the 436 eligible patients, 218 were randomly assigned to the hydrocortisone group (136 women [62.4%]; mean [SD] age, 45.4 [13.0] years) and 218 to the no-hydrocortisone group (128 women [58.7%]; mean [SD] age, 44.5 [13.8] years). All patients completed 3-month postoperative follow-up. The incidence of new-onset adrenal insufficiency during the perioperative period was 11.0% (24 of 218; 95% CI, 6.9%-15.2%) in the no-hydrocortisone group and 6.4% (14 of 218; 95% CI, 3.2%-9.7%) in the hydrocortisone group, with a difference of 4.6% (95% CI, -0.7% to 9.9%), meeting the prespecified noninferiority margin of 10 percentage points. The incidence of adrenal insufficiency at the 3-month follow-up was 3.7% (8 of 218) in the no-hydrocortisone group and 3.2% (7 of 218) in the hydrocortisone group (difference, 0.5%; 95% CI, -3.0% to 3.9%). Incidences of new-onset diabetes mellitus (1 of 218 [0.5%] vs 9 of 218 [4.1%]), hypernatremia (9 of 218 [4.1%] vs 21 of 218 [9.6%]), hypokalemia (23 of 218 [10.6%] vs 34 of 218 [15.6%]), and hypocalcemia (6 of 218 [2.8%] vs 19 of 218 [8.7%]) were lower in the no-hydrocortisone group than in the hydrocortisone group. Lower preoperative morning cortisol levels were associated with higher risks of the primary event (<9.3 mu g/dL; odds ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5-5.9) and the secondary event (<8.8 mu g/dL; odds ratio, 7.8; 95% CI, 2.6-23.4) events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that withholding hydrocortisone was safe and demonstrated noninferiority to the conventional hydrocortisone supplementation regimen regarding the incidence of new-onset adrenal insufficiency among patients with an intact HPA axis undergoing pituitary adenomectomy.

Automated summary

This study demonstrates that withholding hydrocortisone during pituitary adenoma surgery is safe for patients with an intact HPA axis, and the incidence of new-onset adrenal insufficiency is noninferior to the conventional supplementation regimen.