4.7 Article

Probabilistic Lane-Change Decision-Making and Planning for Autonomous Heavy Vehicles

期刊

IEEE-CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 2161-2173

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JAS.2022.106049

关键词

Autonomous heavy truck; decision-making; driving aggressiveness; risk assessment; trajectory planning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposed a probabilistic decision-making and trajectory planning framework for the autonomous heavy trucks, utilizing utility theory and risk assessment for decision process, developing aggressiveness index and stability domains as constraints, providing human-like lane-change decisions and truck-friendly trajectories.
To improve the safety and driving stability of the autonomous heavy truck, it is necessary to consider the differences of driving behavior and drivable trajectories between the heavy trucks and passenger cars. This study proposes a probabilistic decision-making and trajectory planning framework for the autonomous heavy trucks. Firstly, the driving decision process is divided into intention generation and feasibility evaluations, which are realized using the utility theory and risk assessment, respectively. Subsequently the driving decision is made and sent to the trajectory planning module. In order to reflect the greater risks of the truck to other surrounding vehicles, the aggressiveness index (AI) is proposed and quantified to infer the asymmetrical risk level of lane-change maneuver. In the planning stage, the lateral and roll dynamics stability domains are developed as the constraints to exclude the candidate trajectories that would cause vehicle instability. Finally, the simulation results are compared between the proposed model and the artificial potential filed model in the scenarios extracted from the naturalistic driving data. It is shown that the proposed framework can provide the human-like lane-change decisions and truck-friendly trajectories, and performs well in dynamic driving environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据