4.7 Article

Passive radiative personal heating by woven fabrics containing aluminum particles

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY ENERGY
卷 31, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtener.2022.101226

关键词

Thermal comfort; Personal thermal management; Thermal radiation; Woven textile; Infrared transmittance simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents an eco-friendly and cost-effective technique for producing personal thermal management textiles through the melt spinning of Polypropylene/Aluminum (PP/Al) compounds. The optimal diameter and filler loading of spherical Aluminum particles were determined to minimize thermal radiation transmittance. The PP/Al fabrics produced showed suitable wearability and durability properties for passive radiative heating clothing, with a significant increase in skin temperature.
Maintaining the thermal comfort of the human body in cold environments has always been considered for public health and energy saving. In this regard, methods for local heating of the human body through thermal radiation insulation textiles are provided. This article reports on an eco-friendly and cost-effective technique for the industrial production of personal thermal management textiles via the melt spinning of Polypropylene/Aluminum (PP/Al) compounds. The optimum diameter and filler loading of spherical Al particles to minimize thermal radiation transmittance were determined by numerical full wave analysis. The multifilament PP/Al yarns produced by melt spinning were used as weft yarns for fabric weaving. Our investigation of optical, thermal and mechanical properties of the PP/Al fabrics showed that they had suitable wearability and durability properties as passive radiative heating clothing. The total mid-infrared transmittance and the average emissivity of the most effective fabric sample were 0.20% and 16%, respectively. This fabric, as an outdoor winter garment, increased the skin temperature by 3.8 degrees C.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据