4.8 Article

Inhibition of transition-metal dissolution with advanced electrolytes in batteries with silicon-graphite anodes and high-nickel cathodes

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 562-571

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.01.048

关键词

Lithium-ion batteries; Medium-concentration electrolyte; Silicon composite anode; High-nickel cathode; Electrode-electrolyte interphase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, it is demonstrated that medium concentrated lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI)-based electrolyte with optimized fluoroethylene carbonate content can effectively inhibit the dissolution of transition-metal ions, improving the stability of high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries.
Transition-metal (TM) ion dissolution from high-nickel cathodes and the subsequent deposition on Silicon-based anodes impose signiflcant detrimental influence on the cell stability, hindering the application of high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries. Here, we demonstrate an effective approach to inhibit the dissolution of TM ions by using medium concentrated lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI)-based electrolytes with an optimized fluoroethylene carbonate content. The advanced LiFSI-based electrolyte not only stabilizes the surface lattice structure of high-Ni cathodes but also effectively suppress the TM ion dissolution, which beneflt from the for-mation of a LiF-rich solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer on the LiNi0.90Mn0.05Co0.05O2 cathode surface. A robust and protective SEI layer on the SiOx/Gr anode surface is also realized with the newly developed elec-trolyte, which effectively alleviates anode deterioration caused by the deposited TM ions. The SiOx/Gr|| LiNi0.90Mn0.05Co0.05O2 cells with such an advanced electrolyte exhibit remarkably improved cycling stability compared to those with conventional LiPF6-based electrolyte. This study provides insights towards the devel-opment of next-generation high-energy-density batteries with high-Ni cathodes and Si-based anodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据