4.8 Article

Zn metal anodes stabilized by an intrinsically safe, dilute, and hydrous organic electrolyte

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 276-283

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.10.043

关键词

Rechargeable Zn battery; Zn metal anode; Interface chemistry; Hydrous organic electrolyte; Dilute electrolyte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reports a diluted and hydrous organic electrolyte for highly reversible Zn batteries. The electrolyte, consisting of hydrated Zn(BF4)2 salt and trimethyl phosphate (TMP) solvent, enables compact, dendrite-free, and corrosion-free Zn electrodeposition.
Rechargeable Zn batteries hold great promise for large-scale energy storage applications but their reversibility is limited by non-compact and dendritic Zn deposition along with interfacial parasitic reactions in conventional electrolytes. Herein, we report an intrinsically safe, dilute, and hydrous organic electrolyte by coupling hydrated Zn(BF4)(2) salt with trimethyl phosphate (TMP) solvent for highly reversible Zn batteries, without the need of concentrated electrolyte strategies. The formulated 1 m Zn(BF4)(2)/TMP enables spatially compact, dendrite-free, and corrosion-free Zn electrodeposition even at high areal capacity (5 and 10 mAh cm(-2)) using a pressure-free electrolytic cell. Moreover, the hydrous organic electrolyte with low water activity expands the electrochemical window to 3 V (versus Zn2+/Zn) and in-situ forms a protective ZnF2-Zn-3(PO4)(2)-rich interphase on Zn. The resultant Zn electrode achieves long-term cycling over 4200 h with a superhigh cumulative plating capacity of 10500 mAh cm(-2) under 5 mA cm(-2) in Zn//Zn cell and exhibits high efficiency of 99.5% over 600 cycles in Zn//Cu cell (1 mA cm 2; 1 mAh cm(-2)). Moreover, this electrolyte supports the stable operation of a full Zn//V2O5 center dot nH(2)O battery by significantly suppressing cathode dissolution. This work would enlighten the design of hydrous organic electrolytes for practical Zn batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据