4.8 Review

Multidimensional device architectures for efficient power electronics

期刊

NATURE ELECTRONICS
卷 5, 期 11, 页码 723-734

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41928-022-00860-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [ESSC-2036915]
  2. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council [EP/W007614/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines the use of multidimensional architectures in power electronics devices, exploring the performance limits and material advantages of different architectures. Multidimensional architectures can improve the performance of power electronics systems and enable advances in speed, efficiency, and form factor.
This Review examines the use of multidimensional architectures-such as superjunction, multi-channel and multi-gate technologies-in power electronics devices, exploring the performance limits, scaling and material figure of merits of the different architectures. Power semiconductor devices are key to delivering high-efficiency energy conversion in power electronics systems, which is critical in efforts to reduce energy loss, cut carbon dioxide emissions and create more sustainable technology. Although the use of wide or ultrawide-bandgap materials will be required to develop improved power devices, multidimensional architectures can also improve performance, regardless of the underlying material technology. In particular, multidimensional device architectures-such as superjunction, multi-channel and multi-gate technologies-can enable advances in the speed, efficiency and form factor of power electronics systems. Here we review the development of multidimensional device architectures for efficient power electronics. We explore the rationale for using multidimensional architectures and the different architectures available. We also consider the performance limits, scaling and material figure of merits of the architectures, and identify key technological challenges that need to be addressed to realize the full potential of the approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据