4.4 Article

Meltwater Pulse1A Triggered an Extreme Cooling Event: Evidence From Southern China

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022PA004426

关键词

-

资金

  1. Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [41931181]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [4227108, 41772379, 41372372]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0603400]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB26000000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has found that the injection of Meltwater Pulse 1A into the North Atlantic weakened the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation and caused severe winter temperature drop in the Northern Hemisphere. This extreme cooling triggered the BOlling warming event and led to the recovery of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation.
Meltwater Pulse 1A injection into the North Atlantic coincided with the BOlling warming event, despite climate model simulations indicating that the Meltwater Pulse 1A should have inevitably lead to an extreme cooling in the northern hemisphere. However, so far no cooling event has been found in paleoclimate records responding to Meltwater Pulse 1A. Here we reconstruct winter temperature based on sedimentary diatoms from Huguangyan Maar Lake in tropical China. The results show that winter temperature dropped by at least 6 degrees C within similar to 100 years at 14.8 0.02 ka BP, coeval with the onset of Meltwater Pulse 1A, within dating uncertainty. We argue that Meltwater Pulse 1A weakened the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), resulting in abrupt severe cooling in the Northern Hemisphere that caused a severe winter temperature drop in East Asia by strengthening the winter monsoon. We propose that extreme cooling in winter temperature triggered the BOlling warming by stopping the freshwater release from the ice-sheet, triggering the AMOC to recover quickly and causing the BOlling event as an overshoot under gradual forcing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据