4.3 Article

Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage After Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer Patients

期刊

CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 1256-1266

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11596-022-2616-2

关键词

anastomotic leakage; risk factor; defunctioning stoma; propensity score matching

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81974382]
  2. Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Projects in Hubei Province [2018ACA136]
  3. Innovative Team for Human Major Diseases Program, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study retrospectively analyzed data of rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection and found that being male and having T3-T4 stage were independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL). Additionally, defunctioning stoma (DS) was found to reduce the occurrence of symptomatic AL.
Objective: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the serious complications after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Defunctioning stoma (DS) is one of the most widely used approaches to prevent it; however, the effect of DS on the occurrence of AL remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate risk factors of AL and assess the effect of DS after anterior resection for rectal cancer patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted for the data of 1840 patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer from January 2014 to December 2019. Results: The results showed the overall AL incidence was 7.5%. Multivariate analyses revealed that males [odds ratio (OR) 1.562] and T3-T4 stage (OR 1.729) were independent risk factors for all patients. After propensity score matching analysis, the AL incidence was 14.1% in the group with no DS and 6.4% in the DS group (P<0.001). The clinical AL (grade B + grade C) incidence was 12.4% in no DS group and 4.6% in the DS group (P<0.001). Conclusion: The study suggested that males and T3-T4 stage were independent risk factors of AL. In addition, DS could reduce the rate of symptomatic AL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据