4.6 Article

Multi-objective optimization of surface texture for the slipper/swash plate interface in EHA pumps

期刊

出版社

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11465-022-0704-4

关键词

electro-hydrostatic actuator; axial piston pump; slipper/swash plate interface; multi-objective optimization; surface texture

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China
  2. National Outstanding Youth Science Foundation of China
  3. National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China
  4. Major Science and Technology Projects in Ningbo, China
  5. Open Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions, China
  6. [2018YFB2001101]
  7. [51922093]
  8. [51905473]
  9. [2019B10054]
  10. [SKLMT-ZDKFKT-202001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Well-designed surface textures play a significant role in improving the efficiency and reducing wear in EHA pumps. This study proposes a multi-objective optimization model to obtain arbitrarily shaped surface textures at the slipper/swash plate interface, and verifies their positive effects in the EHA pump prototype.
Well-designed surface textures can improve the tribological properties and the efficiency of the electro-hydrostatic actuator (EHA) pump under high-speed and high-pressure conditions. This study proposes a multi-objective optimization model to obtain the arbitrarily surface textures design of the slipper/swash plate interface for improving the mechanical and volumetric efficiency of the EHA pump. The model is composed of the lubrication film model, the component dynamic model considering the spinning motion, and the multi-objective optimization model. In this way, the arbitrary-shaped surface texture with the best comprehensive effect in the EHA pump is achieved and its positive effects in the EHA pump prototype are verified. Experimental results show a reduction in wear and an improvement in mechanical and volumetric efficiency by 1.4% and 0.8%, respectively, with the textured swash plate compared with the untextured one.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据