4.7 Article

Fracture Process and Failure Mode of Brazilian Discs with Cracks of Different Angles: A Numerical Study

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 10, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10244808

关键词

Brazilian disc with cracks; stress field; fracture process zone; numerical simulation

资金

  1. State Key Research Development Program of China
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University
  3. [2018YFC0604606]
  4. [2021zzts0278]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Brazilian disc test with cracks of different angles was analyzed using a hybrid finite-discrete element method. The results showed that the crack angle has a significant effect on the failure mode of the disc, transitioning from splitting into two parts to splitting into four parts as the crack angle increases from 0 degrees to 90 degrees.
In order to determine the effect of internal cracks on the tensile failure of materials, a hybrid finite-discrete element method was used to analyze the Brazilian disc test with cracks of different angles. When the pre-crack angle is between 0 degrees and 60 degrees, the wing crack is initiated from the pre-crack end. When the pre-crack is 90 degrees, the crack initiated from the pre-crack center. When the pre-crack angle is between 0 degrees and 60 degrees, the maximum principal stress and plastic strain are concentrated at the pre-crack end. When the pre-crack angle is 90 degrees, the maximum principal stress and plastic strain are concentrated in the pre-crack center. As the crack angle increased from 0 degrees to 90 degrees, the failure mode of Brazilian discs with cracks transits from splitting into two parts to splitting into four parts. The influence of crack length is further studied. When the crack length is less than 5 mm, the crack angle has little influence on the disc failure mode; Brazilian discs with cracks of different angles undergoes splitting failure along the loading axis. When the crack length is larger than 5 mm, the crack angle has a great effect on the disc failure mode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据