4.7 Article

Anti-Disturbance Fault-Tolerant Constrained Consensus for Time-Delay Faulty Multi-Agent Systems with Semi-Markov Switching Topology

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 10, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10234581

关键词

time-delay multi-agent system; fault-tolerant constrained consensus; disturbance observer; H(infinity )control; semi-Markov switching topology

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang
  4. [LZ22F030008]
  5. [61733009]
  6. [GK229909299001-012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes an approach to achieve anti-disturbance fault-tolerant constrained consensus for time-delay faulty multi-agent systems under semi-Markov switching topology. It includes designing an observer based on disturbance and fault information, constructing a new performance index, and solving numerical solution problem of time-varying transfer rate, ultimately demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed method.
In this article, an approach to achieve the anti-disturbance fault-tolerant constrained consensus is proposed for time-delay faulty multi-agent systems under semi-Markov switching topology. Firstly, an observer based on the coupled disturbance and fault information is designed to estimate the disturbance and failure at the same time. Next, because of the conservatism of the traditional H-infinity control method, a new performance index is constructed to replace the zero initial condition by making use of initial conditions. Then, the time-varying transfer rate is expressed as a convex combination by using the boundedness of transfer rate, so as to solve the numerical solution problem of time-varying transfer rate. On this basis, according to the performance requirements, an anti-disturbance fault-tolerant constrained consensus strategy is proposed. Finally, simulation results are given to verify the feasibility of the approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据