4.7 Article

Kinematic Modeling and Stiffness Analysis of a 3-DOF 3SPS+3PRS Parallel Manipulator

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 10, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10234465

关键词

3-DOF parallel manipulator; kinematic model; stiffness analysis; workspace

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project
  2. [J2019-IV-0002-0069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study establishes the kinematic model of a 3-DOF parallel manipulator with a centering device, deriving Jacobian and Hessian matrices using screw theory and establishing velocity and acceleration models. Through simulation verification and quantitative analysis, the study reveals the variations of translational and rotational stiffness with the positional posture of the parallel manipulator.
The driving mechanism of an axisymmetric vectoring exhaust nozzle (AVEN) is a 3-degrees-of-freedom (3-DOF) parallel manipulator (PM) with a centering device. According to the characteristics of the vectoring nozzle's movement mechanism, the 3-DOF kinematics model of the 3SPS + 3PRS PM is established. The forward and inverse positional posture models are built based on the mechanism architecture of PM and the closed-loop vector method. The Jacobian matrix and Hessian matrix are derived using screw theory, and velocity and acceleration models are established. Based on the principle of virtual work and combined with the kinematics model of PM, a stiffness model was established to analyze stiffness performance. Finally, the effectiveness of the kinematics model of the PM was verified by a simulation, and the variation of stiffness performances with the positional posture of the PM was quantitatively analyzed. The results show that the translational stiffness decreases with forward axial translation of the moving platform and the rotational stiffness is mainly determined by the posture parameters. This study is expected to offer ideas for the kinematic modeling of 3-DOF PM and provide references for application and optimizing of the AVEN's driving mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据