4.6 Article

Functional composite electromagnetic shielding materials for aerospace, electronics and wearable fields

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104498

关键词

Electromagnetic interference shielding; performance; Nanocomposite materials; Wearable electronics; Self -heating

资金

  1. Foundation of Suzhou Science and Technology Project
  2. Six-Talent Peak Project of Jiangsu Province
  3. [SYG201937]
  4. [XNYQC012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the functional requirements, fabrication methods, and comprehensive properties of EMI shielding materials in aerospace, electronics, and wearable fields. It presents the application prospects of composite EMI shielding and self-healing EMI shielding materials, along with the main challenges and future research directions for composite EMI shielding materials.
The rapid development of electronic equipment and communication system has led to the generation of large-scale electromagnetic pollution. Electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding materials can effectively reduce the harm caused by EMI. However, electromagnetic shielding materials with universal functions cannot effec-tively exert their electromagnetic interference shielding performance in all fields. EMI shielding materials used in different fields must have specific functionality in their usage conditions. This paper, reviews the functional requirements, fabrication methods, and comprehensive properties of EMI shielding materials in aerospace, electronics, and wearable fields. Composite EMI shielding materials through structural design and raw material selection to obtain excellent functionality and efficient EMI shielding effectiveness. In addition, this paper pre-sents the application prospects of adjustable composite EMI shielding and self-healing EMI shielding materials. We present the main challenges and prospects for future studies of composite EMI shielding materials based on careful consideration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据