4.6 Article

The effect of ABS fraction on the fatigue behavior of PMMA/ABS polymer blends

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104139

关键词

Fatigue Behavior; PMMA; ABS; Polymer blends

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the fatigue behavior of PMMA/ABS polymer blends through experimental studies. The material properties of the blends were characterized using TGA, FTIR, and DSC investigations. The results show that adding ABS to the blends increases the fatigue strength and number of cycles to failure, but decreases the yield strength. Therefore, PMMA/ABS blends can be used in applications with fatigue loading conditions.
This paper aims to examine the fatigue behavior of the Poly(methyl methacrylate)/ Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (PMMA/ABS) polymer blends by means of experimental studies. For the material characterization of the blends, Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry and Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) investigations was used, which can reveal that the thermal and chemical properties of the blends. The Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used for fractographic analysis of fractured PMMA/ ABS blend specimens after fatigue tests. In this manner, the effects of ABS composition on the fatigue behavior of PMMA/ABS blends were investigated. The results showed that the number of cycles to failure for PMMA/ABS blends higher to pure PMMA, and fatigue strength of PMMA/ABS blends increased with ABS addition compared to pure PMMA. Also, the yield strength of PMMA/ABS blends decreased with increasing the ABS composition whereas total elongation increased. At the same stress amplitude, by increasing the amount of ABS composition in the blend structure, the number of cycles to failure increased 5.96 times. Finally, it can be concluded that the PMMA/ABS blends can be used in the needs of different designs for fatigue loading conditions in applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据