4.6 Article

Preparation of activated carbon fibers (ACF) impregnated with metallic silver particles from cotton-woven wastes and its performance as an antibacterial agent

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104598

关键词

Activated carbons; Adsorption isotherms; Antibacterial activity; Iodine index; Specific surface area; Microporosity

资金

  1. Escuela Politecnica Nacional
  2. [PIS-039-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, activated carbon fibers (ACF) were prepared using cotton-woven wastes as raw material under chemical activation with H3PO4. A highly microporous structure was obtained, and silver particles were impregnated into the fibers, resulting in a strong antibacterial effect.
Although activated carbon has been the subject of numerous research applications in water treatment, purification, catalysis, etc., its production is mainly focused on granular and powder presentations due to the commonly used raw materials (e.g., wood, phenolic resin, etc.). Herein, we report an easily established methodology for preparing activated carbon fibers (ACF) using cotton-woven wastes as raw material under chemical activation with H3PO4. We tested different experimental conditions between the activating agent and the cotton fabrics using a randomized-block experimental design with the specific surface area of the activated fibers as the response variable. A highly microporous structure was obtained with an average specific surface area of 1060 m2/g and pore size of 17 angstrom. The fibers were later impregnated with metallic silver particles using an immersion process in AgNO3 solutions followed by drying and a thermal decomposition to promote the nucleation and precipitation of non-regular shaped silver particles with sizes on the micro and nanoscale within the fiber's porous. The novel material showed a strong antibacterial effect and a complete inhibition of bacterial culture growth with silver contents as low as 200 ppm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据