4.6 Article

Entanglement entropy of the quantum Hall edge and its geometric contribution

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2022.971423

关键词

entanglement entropy; quantum hall; geometric; edge; central charge

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11974064, 61988102]
  2. Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology Grant [cstc2021jcyjmsxmX0081]
  3. Chongqing Talents: Exceptional Young Talents Project [cstc2021ycjh-bgzxm0147]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities Grant [2020CDJQY-Z003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the geometric and edge contributions in the integer quantum Hall (IQH) state and its edge reconstruction are simultaneously explored using a unified bipartite method. The scaling of these contributions is found to be consistent with conformal field theory (CFT) predictions and recent results of particle number fluctuation calculations.
Generally speaking, entanglement entropy (EE) between two subregions of a gapped quantum many-body state is proportional to the area/length of their interface due to the short-range quantum correlation. However, the so-called area law is violated logarithmically in a quantum critical phase. Moreover, the subleading correction exists in long-range entangled topological phases. It is referred to as topological EE which is related to the quantum dimension of the collective excitation in the bulk. Furthermore, if a non-smooth sharp angle is in the presence of the subsystem boundary, a universal angle dependent geometric contribution is expected to appear in the subleading correction. In this work, we simultaneously explore the geometric and edge contributions in the integer quantum Hall (IQH) state and its edge reconstruction in a unified bipartite method. Their scaling is found to be consistent with conformal field theory (CFT) predictions and recent results of particle number fluctuation calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据